To improve modularity <a href="https://github.com/erikras">Erik Rasmussen</a> came up with Ducks: Redux Reducer Bundles. You can read the proposal <a href="https://github.com/erikras/ducks-modular-redux">here</a>. A quick view at the rules: 
<blockquote>
A module...
<ol>
<li>MUST <code>export default</code> a function called <code>reducer()</code></li>
<li>MUST <code>export</code> its action creators as functions</li>
<li>MUST have action types in the form <code>npm-module-or-app/reducer/ACTION_TYPE</code></li>
<li>MAY export its action types as <code>UPPER_SNAKE_CASE</code>, if an external reducer needs to listen for them, or if it is a published reusable library</li>
</ol>
These same guidelines are recommended for <code>{actionType, action, reducer}</code> bundles that are shared as reusable Redux libraries.
</blockquote>
What do you think of Redux Ducks? Would you use them yourself?

To improve modularity [Erik Rasmussen](https://github.com/erikras) came up with **Ducks**: Redux Reducer Bundles. You can read the proposal [here](https://github.com/erikras/ducks-modular-redux). A quick view at the rules:  

> A module...
>
>1. MUST `export default` a function called `reducer()`
>2. MUST `export` its action creators as functions
>3. MUST have action types in the form `npm-module-or-app/reducer/ACTION_TYPE`
>3. MAY export its action types as `UPPER_SNAKE_CASE`, if an external reducer needs to listen for them, or if it is a published reusable library
>
>These same guidelines are recommended for `{actionType, action, reducer}` bundles that are shared as reusable Redux libraries.

What do you think of Redux Ducks? Would you use them yourself?

What do you think of the Redux Ducks proposal?

Product

Explore

Company

Blogs

Support